Jackie Said That Don Omar Is Gay

A "less functionality?

By: Jimenez Sergio Alonso Yataco / / sergjy10@hotmail.com

Within the world of architecture, known as a world exclusive for only a few connoisseurs and art critics beauty is becoming more rare and mostly takes different forms in architecture called pop apparently a sculpture than a building but this is due to the conceptualization of natural forms, the camouflage of perfection but projected a perverse way that many like him but do not understand, only see it but not watch it, but subconsciously intent of the architect is another, and ordinary people or rather the people who are not familiar with the principles and forms in architecture do not stop to perceive it should be and in contradiction to this are the critics who say that we lose the essence of architecture or others feel great if we speak of a clear project which is the''pop Guggenheim by Frank Gehry''a visible example - but also even more conceptual - is taken to an extreme that even they know what they need these forms: a kind of fate or perhaps intent "casual" to build different things when the real beauty lies in improving what already exists not corrupt and make it unintelligible to many. That is what architecture is becoming a very exclusive art for some artists considered but more like social malcontents and who think that art is different or an extreme form. In my opinion, the art goes beyond a simple mash and painted wall jet without pattern or meaning. The beauty lies in the intention, the simple way that through a painting, drawing, sketch, speak for itself: Graphic communicate without words or perhaps in other arts such as music through a melody , convey different feelings and perceived change something else and - although the peculiarity of the architecture is that work on space and so we can do it in a different magnificent and beautiful without actually destroying it - space is something that not many contemporary architects take into account . Do not claim that their works are evil but is hard to grasp that one wants to understand an architectural feat when their creators did not know their origin. Perhaps, as Frank Gehry said:''in the trash you do not know how many spaces and many different textures can be

With ...''

step is to talk about words of inspiration - almost absurd - and not so much talking about architecture, if not of other arts such as sculpture or painting to today for example in France there is a section where artists express themselves as they want but in a confused manner. I once read in a leading Peruvian newspaper about a Japanese artist where art means something very personal, as well as carrying head lice and if we compare it with the architecture so beautiful as capricious, and supposedly trying to sort out the chaos in a composition. Although many have done so magnificently, some are so vain that endure over time and this is also another objective of the architecture: transcend through time. Not many get to that point.

Now the concept and architectural beauty has changed, or perhaps has been lost in time, since it is an art and is adapted to the historical context, this has been good or bad for the evolution of architecture. The good news is that the essence is never going to lose, the bad thing is that there is no universal concept of art and architecture and this is due to the eclecticism of our era. If we go back to the Renaissance time illumination and inspiration, one of its representatives: Leonardo Da Vinci, took natural forms, the studying and conceptualized and obtained large machines or beautiful artistic compositions that even today are still discovering new things about them, something most current, Picasso, a teacher before making abstract art known natural forms, an excellent realistic, so if we compare with the architecture many forget the basic principles, natural laws, perfection as I mentioned.

In conclusion, the art and beauty have changed a couple times well and sometimes we have become evil. What we can do is not become boring or copyists. Vain to ignore the thought of beauty as a pointless quest of man to the difficulty of thinking about it is stagnant. The output is to rediscover the perfection of our nature to do and, if possible, overcome.